Congressional Trading Performance Leaderboard
Which equities appear on the live tracker of top stocks Congress is buying this week?
Real-time stream of high-conviction equity and call option purchases disclosed by members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives over the trailing 7-day period under the STOCK Act of 2012. Quantitative tracking of institutional capital flow across defense, artificial intelligence, and semiconductor contractors.
| Ticker | Company | Key Lawmakers Purchasing | Est. 7-Day Amount | Sector | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | Nancy Pelosi, Josh Gottheimer | $1,000,000 - $5,000,000 | Semiconductors / AI | Aggressive Call Options & Stock Accumulation |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Tommy Tuberville, Dan Crenshaw | $250,000 - $500,000 | Defense AI / Government Data | Direct Share Purchase |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | Zoe Lofgren, Josh Gottheimer | $500,000 - $1,000,000 | Enterprise Cloud / AI Infrastructure | Stock Purchase |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Tommy Tuberville | $100,000 - $250,000 | Aerospace & Defense | DoD Contract Alignment Purchase |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc. | Nancy Pelosi, Ro Khanna | $500,000 - $1,000,000 | AI Custom Silicon | Long-Term Call Options |
Who are the top lawmakers on the congressional trading leaderboard?
The Capitol Trades leaderboard ranks members of the United States Congress by their publicly disclosed stock transactions, estimating portfolio performance using a standardized time-weighted return methodology based strictly on public disclosures.
Every entry is built from public congressional financial disclosure filings, so the ranking is a reorganisation of records that are already in the public domain rather than any private information about how a member trades.
How is the institutional leaderboard ranking constructed?
For each member, disclosed buys and sells are matched to their transaction dates and to public price history, and a time-weighted estimate is produced so that a large one-off position does not distort the picture. The leaderboard orders members by that estimate, linking each row back to its source disclosure.
Because the underlying filings are public, any position on the board can be checked against its source document, and the same disclosure often lists the committee assignments and dates that give a trade its context.
How do statutory bracket valuations and time-weighted metrics work?
STOCK Act filings report dollar amounts in standardized valuation tiers. To avoid arbitrary distortion, Gemral Edge utilizes geometric midpoint values across each bracket and calculates Time-Weighted Disclosure Returns (TWDR) starting from the legal public filing date rather than the private trade execution date.
This mathematical normalization provides a reproducible and verifiable historical audit trail for quantitative analysis.
How does committee oversight impact sectoral transparency?
The leaderboard systematically cross-references lawmaker trading activity with their standing congressional committee assignments—such as the Senate Armed Services Committee, House Committee on Financial Services, House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. This multidimensional mapping surfaces structural intersections between legislative oversight authority and private capital allocation.
What are the top alternative financial and congressional data platforms?
Evaluate how Gemral Edge compares against other quantitative political data and insider tracking terminals:
- Gemral Edge vs Quiver Quantitative: Latency, Breadth & Coverage Comparison
- Gemral Edge vs Capitol Trades: Speed, Defense Contracts & Convergence Comparison
- Gemral Edge vs Unusual Whales: Options Flow vs Real-Time STOCK Act Filings
- Gemral Edge vs OpenInsider: SEC Form 4 Cluster Buying vs Political Stock Portfolios
How should alternative data signals be interpreted responsibly?
The leaderboard serves as an analytical starting point for institutional research rather than a predictive trading recommendation. It highlights committee jurisdictional overlaps, sector concentrations, and trading velocity across successive filings to provide transparency into public legislative capital allocation.
It is a data view of public disclosures, not a ranking of skill and not a recommendation to follow anyone. Real-time delivery and the full board are available on paid plans.
What statistical constraints and sample-size minimums govern lawmaker ranking integrity?
To maintain quantitative rigor and prevent statistical distortion caused by lucky single-trade outliers, the Gemral Edge Congressional Leaderboard enforces strict minimum trade thresholds before calculating annual performance rankings. Lawmakers must log verified discrete transactions to qualify for time-weighted return benchmarking.
This sample-size discipline filters out inactive accounts and ensures that ranking metrics reflect sustained, repeatable capital allocation patterns rather than isolated market windfalls.
How does the leaderboard normalize transaction reporting delays to calculate true alpha?
Because the STOCK Act permits a statutory disclosure window of up to 45 days, measuring investment returns strictly from execution dates misrepresents the actionable opportunity available to public market participants. The Gemral Edge Congressional Leaderboard tracks both Execution-to-Filing return lag and post-filing forward returns over 30, 60, and 90-day holding periods, enabling researchers to distinguish genuine legislative forecasting skill from market beta.
How does committee jurisdiction weighting enhance legislative oversight transparency?
The Committee Oversight Weighting Factor quantifies the proportional overlap between a lawmaker personal stock portfolio and their legislative committee jurisdiction. When committee members trade equities within their regulatory oversight, the platform flags the transaction cluster with explicit regulatory jurisdiction tags.
This systematic tagging provides researchers and compliance analysts with objective, verifiable context regarding potential policy conflicts of interest.
Track Real-Time Congressional Stock Disclosures
Unlock live STOCK Act alerts, complete 535-member trading dossiers, and committee conflict analysis.
Upgrade to Gemral Edge Pro ($39/mo)Who are the top 20 congressional stock traders by performance?
Ranked by estimated 1-year time-weighted portfolio return from verified STOCK Act disclosures.
| Rank | Lawmaker | Party-State | Chamber | Estimated 1Y ROI | Disclosed Volume | Core Holdings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roger Williams | R-TX | HOUSE | +225.7% | $101K | META, LLY, JPM |
| 2 | David J. Taylor | R-OH | HOUSE | +194.6% | $1.2M | LLY, V, PG |
| 3 | John J. McGuire III | R-VA | HOUSE | +172.1% | $85K | NVDA, META, MSFT |
| 4 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 5 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 6 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 7 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 8 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 9 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 10 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 11 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 12 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 13 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 14 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 15 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 16 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 17 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 18 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 19 | ███ | - | — | — | — | |
| 20 | ███ | - | — | — | — |
Frequently asked questions
What does the Capitol Trades leaderboard show?
The Capitol Trades leaderboard on Gemral Edge ranks active and former members of the United States Congress based on their disclosed stock trading activity, portfolio asset distribution, and historical transaction timing. Drawing directly from official Periodic Transaction Reports (PTRs) filed under the STOCK Act of 2012, the leaderboard indexes trade counts, total estimated volume, holding asset classes, and sector preferences for each lawmaker. Users can filter rankings by political chamber (Senate vs. House of Representatives), legislative committee assignments, party affiliation, and specific calendar timeframes. This transparent ranking provides researchers with an empirical, non-partisan overview of which lawmakers are most active in financial markets and where congressional capital concentrates. All transaction figures reflect official statutory filings submitted under the STOCK Act of 2012, delivered for transparent market research, committee oversight analysis, and civic accountability without personalized financial recommendations.
How is portfolio performance estimated?
Congressional portfolio performance is estimated using standardized time-weighted return methodologies applied to disclosed transaction ranges and execution dates. Because the STOCK Act requires lawmakers to disclose trade values within broad statutory brackets (such as $1,001–$15,000 or $50,001–$100,000) rather than exact dollar figures, Gemral Edge computes midpoint estimates for each transaction. The model tracks the price performance of disclosed equities from the reported transaction date against standard market benchmarks like the S&P 500 index. These calculations represent mathematical approximations designed to gauge relative timing efficacy and sector concentration rather than exact audited personal wealth, maintaining clear methodological transparency regarding filing limitations. All transaction figures reflect official statutory filings submitted under the STOCK Act of 2012, delivered for transparent market research, committee oversight analysis, and civic accountability without personalized financial recommendations. Original electronic disclosure documents from the House Clerk and Senate Office of Public Records remain directly accessible via public links.
Can I see the underlying disclosures?
Yes. Gemral Edge maintains complete primary-source data provenance for every entry on the Capitol Trades leaderboard. Users can click on any individual lawmaker to view their complete chronological transaction ledger, detailing the underlying asset ticker, transaction type (purchase, sale, or exchange), statutory value bracket, reported trade date, and filing disclosure date. Furthermore, each transaction links directly to the official PDF or electronic filing hosted on the United States House of Representatives Clerk portal or the Senate Office of Public Records electronic Financial Disclosure (eFD) database. This full audit trail enables compliance officers, journalists, and researchers to verify every record against original government records. All transaction figures reflect official statutory filings submitted under the STOCK Act of 2012, delivered for transparent market research, committee oversight analysis, and civic accountability without personalized financial recommendations.
Risk Disclaimer
Trading and investing in digital assets, financial instruments, and predictive events involve substantial risk of loss and are not suitable for every investor. The predictive intelligence, probability distributions, historical precedents, and scenario modeling presented on this page are compiled for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Past performance and statistical precedents do not guarantee future outcomes. Always conduct independent due diligence before committing capital.